5 years later, the cause...

CUSO

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2007
Messages
4,772
Reaction score
5,538
Location
Edmonton
Ya, so I wonder if BP is still on the hook for the failure, I mean they paid billions already.

The manufacturers of the BOP might have to claim some responsibility.
 

lilduke

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2009
Messages
19,974
Reaction score
71,297
Location
Local
Yeah lets go drill for oil in 5000feet of water,, what could possibly go wrong? LMAO
 

youngpolarisguy

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2007
Messages
1,075
Reaction score
448
Location
Wabamun
Yeah lets go drill for oil in 5000feet of water,, what could possibly go wrong? LMAO

I guess 5000ft is nothing when the deepwater horizon was capable of drilling in 10000ft of water. that was whole lot of crap that had to go wrong for that to happen. just hopefully nothing like this happens again.
 

lilduke

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2009
Messages
19,974
Reaction score
71,297
Location
Local
I guess 5000ft is nothing when the deepwater horizon was capable of drilling in 10000ft of water. that was whole lot of crap that had to go wrong for that to happen. just hopefully nothing like this happens again.


Capable of doing it sure. Too bad It only takes one "accident" to do irreversible damage to the planet. Nuclear energy HAD a pretty good track record too....


Like I said; drilling for oil in 5000feet of water,,, what could go wrong....LMAO
 

CUSO

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2007
Messages
4,772
Reaction score
5,538
Location
Edmonton
Damb Duke.. Where were you 5 years ago.. This coulda been prevented!!

Capable of doing it sure. Too bad It only takes one "accident" to do irreversible damage to the planet. Nuclear energy HAD a pretty good track record too....


Like I said; drilling for oil in 5000feet of water,,, what could go wrong....LMAO
 

arff

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Messages
142,927
Reaction score
56,598
Location
Leduc
Thanks for posting.
 

CUSO

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2007
Messages
4,772
Reaction score
5,538
Location
Edmonton
Well the vid did show that the wiring was faulty...

Thats why I kind of wonder if it was all of BP's responsibility...?>?>

Relying on a powered shutdown in the event of failure is ridiculous, shutdown circuits should be designed to fail closed or in the safe position on loss of signal.
 

sirkdev

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2008
Messages
3,316
Reaction score
5,429
Location
Stony Plain
Well the vid did show that the wiring was faulty...

Thats why I kind of wonder if it was all of BP's responsibility...?>?>

Agreed the wiring was faulty, but the shutdown should have been active if there was a fault or inoperable part in the shutdown system. Im not sure who takes liability on that? Surely they must have function tests and be required to prove shutdowns periodically just like any other hazardous operation in industry. I guess it comes down to who owns the BOP and is responsible for its proper operation? When I have a contractor working on my lease it is my responsibility as a site supervisor (BP representative) to confirm that all calibrations and certifications are in place and current. This is generally satisfied with pre jobs and permitting. Undoubtedly there will be a lot of finger pointing on this one. Hopefully we learn something from this.
 
Last edited:

Absledder

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2013
Messages
761
Reaction score
687
Location
bonnyville
Every other safety device I know of is designed to fail in the safe position when power/communication is cut. For example all our gas valves at work are designed to automatically close if the lose air pressure. I'm actually amazed these BOP's were designed and signed off by engineers considering how easy it was for them to have the wiring mixed up. Even designed the way they were they should have been tested before being placed on the bottom of the fricken ocean
 

vrscr43

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2008
Messages
186
Reaction score
355
Location
Sherwood Park
Obviously the emergency systems were not functioned checked on the surface, as circuits were wired incorrectly.
That's crazy, 5000 feet down and we forgot to function check the safety system.....
 

cdnredneck_t3

Active VIP Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2012
Messages
692
Reaction score
1,597
Location
East of the Rockies and west of the rest.
I am not a BOP expert, I work in downstream but did spend a year in upstream. It seems to me they are building the failsafe to allow redundant manual activation. If the shear were to engage because of a communication loss caused by something as simple as a bad connector that would cause more harm than good. I don't know how hard it would be to repair the well or if it would be a total loss.

What I am wondering about is why there would be enough clearance in the shear that if the drill stem was out of centre it only partially cut it. I would think that the shear would be designed that it could cut the drill pipe no matter what. I have seen videos of rigs taking a kick and it will push the drill pipe out of the well like spaghetti. It makes sense that the pipe might not be centred in the BOP.

There has to be some BOP experts on here to explain things a bit better.
 

Bogger

Bogger of the GBCA
Joined
Feb 21, 2007
Messages
24,426
Reaction score
18,506
Location
Down by the Bay
I've had the privilege of working with and discussing this incident with one of the lead investigators for Transocean.

Was a tragedy and an environmental disaster but very interesting from an investigation point of view. less than 12 hours prior to the incident the crew was recognized by senior company officials for record safety performance.
 

CUSO

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2007
Messages
4,772
Reaction score
5,538
Location
Edmonton
Apparently that pipe is 21" in diameter. that would be some massive shears...
 
Top Bottom