Cat401
Active VIP Member
cant a person sue for underselling someone a product and false claims...
lol...good luck with that...let me know if BRP sends you a cheque
cant a person sue for underselling someone a product and false claims...
BRP never claimed 163 hp. It's been shown dozens of times that claim was from an independent dyno. They even state that. Read the fine print. Dyno tech has run them from 155-158hp several times since that hopped up 2010.5 sled was run.
Doesn't mean they can't make 163+ from the etec they just detune them to give you the 3-4 warranty. A little timing advance on the etec does wonders!
165 is 10hp more. Makes sense.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Manufacturers uses 3rd party testing to show unbiased results and when those results are positive, it becomes part of their advertising.
If the 3rd party has proven 163 hp, why is BRP now saying its 155hp ??
From everything I saw it's a new chassis. Tunnel, bulkhead, which is the chassis. So it might be deserving of its on section.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Float 3 upgrade package from Doo.
//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160223/fa9cef2053c2d5f0f9ad0156e3026280.jpg
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What do you think this can weighs for you weight conscious folks?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk