- Thread starter
- #21
summit1000
Active member
Another happy M1100T owner here as well. My 2013 162 Ltd came from T&T in Bonnyville, have yet to blow a belt. Mine is jacked up with a BC280 turbo from Evolution Powersports, some lightweight goodies and a C3 Syncrodrive belt drive. Our "backup" M800 162 S/P Ltd usually stays home or sits in the trailer all by itself.
Half of the issues with the M1100T is poor dealer setup, and clutches that were not aligned properly. Other problem is they are not clutched / geared as a trail sled, yet half of the owners trail ride / lake race them. If it is setup for the mountains, it will work VERY well there. BTW, my 5'2" wife can ride it in the backcountry and she does well. For reference, her sled is a PRO RMK...
Well, I'm glad to hear that......crazy_wheeler's sounds like it has a nice setup that'd help with backcountry riding. I would be do some trail and lake riding, but I'd take it easy on the throttle when on the lake or trail. I keep thinking to myself that coming from an '06 Summit 1000, '98 670 Summit, and '01 Mountain Cat 1000, the newer chassis would have to be substantially better for maneuverability than any of those sleds. The Summit 1000 I did struggle on a bit, but it was the first sled I had been on in almost 10 years and I had almost gotten used to it after just 200km's of riding, but then had to sell it. I did extremely well on the old 670 Summit and could throw it around with ease, and due to lack of snow I only but 70 miles on the Arctic Cat 1000 and it was 70 miles of riding it with carb issues so I never really got to experience how well I was handling it......but at the very least, logic would say that an M1100 Turbo has to be an upgrade in handling from any of these sleds....doesn't it?