2005 RMK 900 50th anniv edition...opi

[jay007]

Track length really depends on the type of riding you do. Over the last few years I have had a 136/144/151/159. In deeper snow the longer track outperforms the shorter track, for boondocking the shorter track will often be your best bet.

So exactly what kind of riding do you plan to do--remember that a track won't satisfy all types of riding so tell us what 60% of your riding will be?

I think I am going to keep my 670 136, especially for ditch bangin, and maybe let dad ride, so i'm starting to lean towrds the longer track so I can be high markin with the rest of you.

Still debating which on to go for, starting to lean towrds the 1000, just because I will still have the 670 for playin with when the big power isn't needed.

 

[Rucky]

I think I am going to keep my 670 136, especially for ditch bangin, and maybe let dad ride, so i'm starting to lean towrds the longer track so I can be high markin with the rest of you.

Still debating which on to go for, starting to lean towrds the 1000, just because I will still have the 670 for playin with when the big power isn't needed.

If you do the math I'm sure the 670 would have a very close, if not better power to weight ratio than the 1000

 

[SLEDBUNNYRACING]

I don't think so Rucky, that one thousand has a ton of power on tap and although they are lovingly called the "One Ton" they have POWER....oh, I'm not a fan of the 1000 either.

If you do the math I'm sure the 670 would have a very close, if not better power to weight ratio than the 1000

 

[Rucky]

I don't think so Rucky, that one thousand has a ton of power on tap and although they are lovingly called the "One Ton" they have POWER....oh, I'm not a fan of the 1000 either.

3.828125 lbs per hp on a 1999 Summit 670 X

3.1411764705882352941176470588235 lbs per hp on a 2007 Summit 1000.

Sledbunny, you were correct. Remember peeps this might not be dead on accurate, but it proves the point.

 

[dooryder]

3.828125 lbs per hp on a 1999 Summit 670 X

3.1411764705882352941176470588235 lbs per hp on a 2007 Summit 1000.

Sledbunny, you were correct. Remember peeps this might not be dead on accurate, but it proves the point.

how did you calculate that?
whats the fourmulay

weight divided by horse power?

 

[Rucky]

how did you calculate that?
whats the fourmulay

weight divided by horse power?

Yeah. I should also add that I was using dry weight and horsepower as listed by Ski-Doo (I think )

 

[SLEDBUNNYRACING]

Thanks Rucky for doing the hard work...

Yeah. I should also add that I was using dry weight and horsepower as listed by Ski-Doo (I think )