163 3" or 155 3"?

R

Ryan Verrecchia

Guest
Hey guys would just like some input on a decision. I'm 6,3 270lbs very good tree rider current sled is a 163 pro rmk. I'm thinking about a turbo next year was-wondering if I should go with a 155 3" or 163 3". I'm at sea level il be running around 7-8psi only riding i do really is tree riding. Which sled do you recommend thanks. We get tons of snow by the way sometimes 4 foot dumps.
 

powder junkie

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2008
Messages
787
Reaction score
527
Location
redwater, alberta, canada
Hey guys would just like some input on a decision. I'm 6,3 270lbs very good tree rider current sled is a 163 pro rmk. I'm thinking about a turbo next year was-wondering if I should go with a 155 3" or 163 3". I'm at sea level il be running around 7-8psi only riding i do really is tree riding. Which sled do you recommend thanks. We get tons of snow by the way sometimes 4 foot dumps.


163 wont be a problem riding. U have it already so y go smaller?
 

Dannyturbo

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2013
Messages
314
Reaction score
594
Location
Valemount
If you get a lot of snow 163 without a doubt!


Sent from my iPhone while drinkin a bud light
 
Top Bottom