skidoo 2016

Clode

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
29,550
Reaction score
46,587
Location
BC
Hopefully they are smart enough to realize the t3 174 will still walk all over that new axys. Although it's new it's deep snow performance will not touch the current T3 174 sleds. 163 maybe because they are much lighter those sleds may be comparable now that they have a 2.7 track


pretty bold statement since the full Polaris line isn't released and the Axis mountain has yet to to hit the snow for performance comparison....
 

takethebounce

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2008
Messages
5,193
Reaction score
8,750
Location
calgary
Hopefully they are smart enough to realize the t3 174 will still walk all over that new axys. Although it's new it's deep snow performance will not touch the current T3 174 sleds. 163 maybe because they are much lighter those sleds may be comparable now that they have a 2.7 track

I thought that was you on the back of that Yammy with Trent

I wouldn't be surprised to see the 3" on the 163 and possible longer RMK's

I would be just as happy with a track profile that bridges the gap between the 2.5 and 3 with a 2.75ish but with the 2.6" on the 155 I have to wonder would they dare release a 3.1"? Haha


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

maxwell

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
20,082
Reaction score
43,170
Location
Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada
pretty bold statement since the full Polaris line isn't released and the Axis mountain has yet to to hit the snow for performance comparison....

Nothing bold about that statement the "axys" is an updated chassis and it's still not a 174x3. If polaris releases a 174x3 with that new engine and being lighter then yes it would likely beat the T3.
 

maxwell

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
20,082
Reaction score
43,170
Location
Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada
I thought that was you on the back of that Yammy with Trent

I wouldn't be surprised to see the 3" on the 163 and possible longer RMK's

I would be just as happy with a track profile that bridges the gap between the 2.5 and 3 with a 2.75ish but with the 2.6" on the 155 I have to wonder would they dare release a 3.1"? Haha


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Well it would be an industry first! Although this season I wish I had my old 1.5" track
 

Nikm17

Active member
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
75
Reaction score
88
Location
Edmonton
The one thing I don't understand is why they would discontinue the 2.5 track in the summit X. The sleds are all ordered now so it's not like it would be hard at all to do a run of some with 3" and another run with the 2.5. Sure you can get a 2.5 in an sp but there are a lot of guys that just like the X better because it makes them feel more exclusive, or has better bars and shocks, or whatever the case may be. Now they have no choice but to get a 3" or not have a summit X, which to me seems pretty dumb. I thought the whole point of snow heck was to give the customer more/better choices.
 

takethebounce

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2008
Messages
5,193
Reaction score
8,750
Location
calgary
Well you couldn't get a Summit X with a 2.25 or 2" any more after 2012. So what about the guys who wanted a 2.25?

Just the evolution of the model.

They can always order the T3 X and swap out the track for a 2.5" and likely make a few bucks doing so!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

niner

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2009
Messages
8,607
Reaction score
61,916
Location
lacombe
You don't like your 3' track there is always this route.....
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    9 KB · Views: 339

adamg

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2011
Messages
3,473
Reaction score
4,687
Location
S'toon,SK
Was the same in 15 for polaris when all they did was add some color and shocks. I think ski doo has enough sled to carry them through a few years. Always room for improvement i guess but its not a huge deal they didnt make any drastic changes.

VanceM

Agreed, and I voted with my wallet by checking a 15 doo. I suspect I'll be following suit this year by checking a 16 poo.
 

stormtrooper

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2010
Messages
266
Reaction score
144
Location
wct, ab
Dealers shouldn't have any issues moving the remaining SP's now. Then add on the RAS front suspension for a grand and you'll have a 2016 way before any of the snow checkers and pay way less.

You can get "taller" spindles by using the tall upper ball joint from a 2013 mx rs for about 100 bucks.
 

pistoncontracting

Active VIP Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2012
Messages
1,010
Reaction score
1,842
Location
On the edge
Nothing bold about that statement the "axys" is an updated chassis and it's still not a 174x3. If polaris releases a 174x3 with that new engine and being lighter then yes it would likely beat the T3.

The 174x3 on the T3 is a great feature on the Doo chassis. That way it has a better chance on not getting stuck when it continually washes out.
 

pfi572

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
6,064
Reaction score
15,264
Location
Grande Prairie
If you are not on the 3 inch track kick it only takes a 1/2 hour to make it 2.5 inch or 2.6 or 2.7 ? Pair of shears makes short work of the lugs.
The new track is lighter and seems to be standing up so no big deal really.
Cheers
 

Steve D

Active VIP Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2010
Messages
611
Reaction score
1,018
Location
.
Yes but before it gets instaneous lift, is it flickable yet? I see nothing on doos site and that's important!
 
Top Bottom