Well same crap, up and down and all around on that controller, got the knock sensor to go off for the first time, but no differrence, probably the last ride so ill pick it up again in december. Maybe ill try to sell it and go back to a yamaha....he, he. Sure alot less screwin around.
I have been reading through this post and I had a few things I wanted to make discussion of...
I kinda disagree that sizing the turbo is different for a sled than a car (i mean, I agree it is different, being small displacement two stroke, vs a a 4 stroke car engine). But the general principles are the same arent they? the turbo is an air pump (as is the engine), spun by wasted exhaust energy (heat mostly, then pressure to a lesser extent). I dont feel that the issue is that a larger turbo compressor will increase the heat of the charge, more likely that you can get surging/stalling which can toast a turbos bearings/thrust bearing quickly. However a lot of compressor housings come with anti surge porting now which allow smaller engines to run much larger compressors without surging (like some of these car guys making 800+ hp on a 2L engine or even 1500hp on a 3L engine). Conversely an undersized compressor will choke causing it to increase in backpressure, overspeed at high rpm , blow oil seals, etc. In saying all that, imo there isnt really a reason to go with an overly large compressor on a sled anyways because even if you can spool it by a useable rpm, how much power is really necessary on a sled before you just flip over every time you nail the throttle. lol
Whats important and often overlooked is the Density ratio, which you mentioned in different terms i guess, by mentioning altitude and temperature. But those things are also of major importance to an automotive application as well.
Correct me if im wrong... I just wanted to join the discussion to learn more about sled applications
NM,
I tried to explain why a turbo that is too big will have higher charge temps, but let me break it down at little bit more. I do love explaining this stuff so, here it goes and please anybody feel free to ask questions.
A compressor map is like a topo map. The top of the “mountain” is where you want to operate the turbo. Like a mountain there is a ridge, and as you go up in altitude or increase boost, you move along this ridge. You always want to operate as high on the “mountain” as possible. If the turbo is matched correctly you will always stay on the ridge as you change boost and/or altitude. By using a bigger turbo, you will be operating lower on the “mountain” than is best. The lower on the “mountain”, the lower the compressor efficiency. The lower the efficiency, the more heat the compressor makes at a given boost or pressure ratio. The higher the heat, the lower the air density is - therefore less oxygen to burn with the fuel. Less oxygen and fuel = less hp.
Engine load has nothing to do with compressor size as we do not care about compressor efficiency anywhere but 100% throttle on a CVT. A bigger turbo would only perform worse at less than 100% throttle, because it is even less efficient at part throttle then 100%.
With over 300 Aerocharged E-tecs, we can recommend 12.5-13 AFR - any more fuel than 12.5 and the E-tec is not happy. Your Pro will take more, but not the E-tec.
You said your AFR starts at high 12’s and creep down to low 12’s to save the motor... Does the boost-it box have a timer and add fuel as 100% tps is maintained? What if the pull is longer then you planed- does it keep adding fuel? We have run 30hrs straight at 100% with no issues. My guess would be your system is heat soaking and that is the cause of the creeping AFR. As the system heats up, the system has less oxygen and needs less fuel.
174 x 3 is a popular upgrade and we have many systems running this combination, including some in Revy without issues.
The race circuit is where I get to play with new technologies that do relate to back country riding weather at 11,000ft in Colorado or in Revy. Carl Kuster will be servicing and stocking kits at his CKMP in that neck of the woods. He puts on about 4k miles a year…lucky dog.
NM,
I tried to explain why a turbo that is too big will have higher charge temps, but let me break it down at little bit more. I do love explaining this stuff so, here it goes and please anybody feel free to ask questions.
A compressor map is like a topo map. The top of the “mountain” is where you want to operate the turbo. Like a mountain there is a ridge, and as you go up in altitude or increase boost, you move along this ridge. You always want to operate as high on the “mountain” as possible. If the turbo is matched correctly you will always stay on the ridge as you change boost and/or altitude. By using a bigger turbo, you will be operating lower on the “mountain” than is best. The lower on the “mountain”, the lower the compressor efficiency. The lower the efficiency, the more heat the compressor makes at a given boost or pressure ratio. The higher the heat, the lower the air density is - therefore less oxygen to burn with the fuel. Less oxygen and fuel = less hp.
Engine load has nothing to do with compressor size as we do not care about compressor efficiency anywhere but 100% throttle on a CVT. A bigger turbo would only perform worse at less than 100% throttle, because it is even less efficient at part throttle then 100%.
With over 300 Aerocharged E-tecs, we can recommend 12.5-13 AFR - any more fuel than 12.5 and the E-tec is not happy. Your Pro will take more, but not the E-tec.
You said your AFR starts at high 12’s and creep down to low 12’s to save the motor... Does the boost-it box have a timer and add fuel as 100% tps is maintained? What if the pull is longer then you planed- does it keep adding fuel? We have run 30hrs straight at 100% with no issues. My guess would be your system is heat soaking and that is the cause of the creeping AFR. As the system heats up, the system has less oxygen and needs less fuel.
174 x 3 is a popular upgrade and we have many systems running this combination, including some in Revy without issues.
The race circuit is where I get to play with new technologies that do relate to back country riding weather at 11,000ft in Colorado or in Revy. Carl Kuster will be servicing and stocking kits at his CKMP in that neck of the woods. He puts on about 4k miles a year…lucky dog.
Holy crap!!! Are you Bill Nye the Science Guy? Lol.Do to the nature of this thread I have to correct you on this point tho. Yes warmer air is less dense than colder.True
However this has everything to do with intake air temp, not charge air temp.
A turbocharger draws in air from outside into a CLOSED SYSTEM. Air is made up of 99% of the Di atomic molecules N2 and O2(79% nitogen,, 20% oxegen). Once the air is in this closed system, there is no where for the oxegen to go execpt to the combustion chamber, no matter how much tempature it gains passing through the turbo.
Again go put an oxegen tank in the oven, it might explode but until it does there wont be any less oxegen molecules in the tank...
There is reasons for the higher charge temps hurting performance,, but less oxegen molecules aint it.....
Holy crap!!! Are you Bill Nye the Science Guy? Lol.
Start reading... And do the math
theories, some ppl may agree and some disagree.
Sometimes it's more of a preference and what makes sense to that person with there current knowledge.