Fiat V8 hemi is gonzo?

Lem Lamb

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2010
Messages
4,281
Reaction score
7,802
Location
Lacombe AB
We heard rumors that Dodge Ram Jeep is bringing the old slant 6 pack back...

High deck height,,, big swing crank and small port heads too get them going...

134.8 ft-lbs torque matt'ed too the rug with regular fuel in second gear...

Kick up some dirt they say... lol

3 on the tree tranny too boot...
 

lilduke

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2009
Messages
19,339
Reaction score
68,695
Location
Local
Just got this email from dodge. 540hp. Sounds great except the TRX it is replacing has 700hp...

Screenshot_20240427_081455_Chrome.jpg


Screenshot_20240427_081439_Chrome.jpg
 

acesup800

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2008
Messages
1,457
Reaction score
2,650
Location
BC
And if it drove for those 8 hrs everyday it would put an extra 1000 km a day on and would have had a million km on it, idling is as hard on engine life as is driving. If you need to idle a truck all day to keep warm buy a diesel or a Tesla


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Idling a diesel without high idle setting is just as hard on diesels as it is on gassers. They can get piston wash. Most have it when cold, but once warm they all idle down unless you added the high idle kit, at least that is the way GM's work.
 

tmo1620

Active VIP Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2008
Messages
4,033
Reaction score
7,986
Location
Whitecourt
Idling a diesel without high idle setting is just as hard on diesels as it is on gassers. They can get piston wash. Most have it when cold, but once warm they all idle down unless you added the high idle kit, at least that is the way GM's work.

The Cummins in a dodge cycles between high idle and normal all on its own, smart enough to know. Mine will idle up and idle down even sitting in a drive thru. I do have mine set to idle higher than normal as well


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

JMCX

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2007
Messages
1,606
Reaction score
3,863
Location
Calgary
I spent a day driving a Wagoneer with one of these twin turbo inline 6s. Throttle response is decent but not Hemi like. Power is strong and smooth. Economy was 14 l/100 going to Banff and back. Driving mellow a little above the speed limit. So not spectacular. My F350 would have been in the 11-12s.
 

tmo1620

Active VIP Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2008
Messages
4,033
Reaction score
7,986
Location
Whitecourt
I spent a day driving a Wagoneer with one of these twin turbo inline 6s. Throttle response is decent but not Hemi like. Power is strong and smooth. Economy was 14 l/100 going to Banff and back. Driving mellow a little above the speed limit. So not spectacular. My F350 would have been in the 11-12s.

That is pretty terrible economy, my ram 3500 diesel gets 11


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Chump

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2008
Messages
2,145
Reaction score
8,554
Location
calgary
There a small bus. I don't think fuel economy was a priority.... and this is an inline 6. Alot different then a v that's in everything else. I bet they'll outlast most of the eco boosts. But time will tell
 

Caper11

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2007
Messages
9,595
Reaction score
18,803
Location
Edson,Alberta
Dodge must of hired a ford engineer because it seems Dodge is focused on what Ford did with the eco boost 10 years ago, but ford is going back to V8’s.

My Grand Cherokee L with the hemi is getting 10.5 to 11.5L on the highway with me driving it. It’s hard not to keep the RPM’s down, the engine sounds very healthy. Lol

Just for comparison, I rented a New rav 4 around the middle of April, to take to a work meeting in Edmonton. It consumed 16L less than my Jeep when I went to the city last Thursday, the head wind home was brutal last week. The Jeep said 11.8 on the dash.
 

Bnorth

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2010
Messages
10,759
Reaction score
20,773
Location
Salmon Arm
I spent a day driving a Wagoneer with one of these twin turbo inline 6s. Throttle response is decent but not Hemi like. Power is strong and smooth. Economy was 14 l/100 going to Banff and back. Driving mellow a little above the speed limit. So not spectacular. My F350 would have been in the 11-12s.
Calgary to Banff sucks for mileage as there is almost always a brisk headwind there. My levelled eco on 33s does 14 L/100 on that stretch cruise set at 130, passing at 140.
 

JMCX

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2007
Messages
1,606
Reaction score
3,863
Location
Calgary
Calgary to Banff sucks for mileage as there is almost always a brisk headwind there. My levelled eco on 33s does 14 L/100 on that stretch cruise set at 130, passing at 140.
Round trip. So tail-wind back. Kind of a equals out.
 

Luke The Drifter

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
1,512
Reaction score
2,752
Location
Parkland County
Dodge must of hired a ford engineer because it seems Dodge is focused on what Ford did with the eco boost 10 years ago, but ford is going back to V8’s.

My Grand Cherokee L with the hemi is getting 10.5 to 11.5L on the highway with me driving it. It’s hard not to keep the RPM’s down, the engine sounds very healthy. Lol

Just for comparison, I rented a New rav 4 around the middle of April, to take to a work meeting in Edmonton. It consumed 16L less than my Jeep when I went to the city last Thursday, the head wind home was brutal last week. The Jeep said 11.8 on the dash.
Meanwhile Toyota and Nissan are laughing as they did the whole twin turbo inline 6, 30 years ago in their sports cars...
 

MP Kid

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Messages
3,117
Reaction score
4,327
Location
East of Calgary
Buddy had a whipple on his company truck few years ago (5.3L GM). It was definitely a major upgrade.
Now he drives a TRX….
 

lilduke

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2009
Messages
19,339
Reaction score
68,695
Location
Local
Id like a TRX. But they are priced retarded.
And already have a bunch of money in mods on the green goblin.

So whipple charger it is i think.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom