Next to the Recommend this post and love this post.. there should be a button showing someone getting hit in the beans for starting a useless thread.
This thread is not. good.
Next to the Recommend this post and love this post.. there should be a button showing someone getting hit in the beans for starting a useless thread.
This thread is not. good.
Once you meet the thread starter then you will understand
I would think it's sorta the other way around, all those pro guys that thought their sleds were awesome because they could keep up with the doo after clutching and gearing and a pipe....only to find they were the same hp from the get go.I don't know what would pizz me off more......having 2 gals. of fuel that can't be used....not that it was needed anyways...lol........or being lied to by BRP about having 163 hp for a long time only to find out its only got 155...pretty much the same as the Polaris sled.....who they've (the doo crowd) been laughing at all year saying its gutless.......?????
I would think it's sorta the other way around, all those pro guys that thought their sleds were awesome because they could keep up with the doo after clutching and gearing and a pipe....only to find they were the same hp from the get go.
I think till this year Poo was always about 10 HP less than the etec, stock to stock.
Re read your post one last time. It's not good dude. It's kind of saying that the new sled lost 20+ pounds DRY by carrying the same amount of fuel as before (doesn't make sense) in a tank that is a little smaller and weighs maybe a pound or 2 less. You're deliberately ignoring facts to make a re$&%ded post. This is the internet. We don't stand for that kind of thing here. For shame...Bitch all you want about the poster, but fact remains the original post is true. Sorry, not my fault.
So are the new Doo's going to be easier to pull off the hill (broke down) or the same?
Honest question here folks
I think any sled that needs to be pulled off the hill is a real drag regardless of the weight. So much lost potential for fun...
Lenny I had thought more of you than this.. if you looked once again your hp numbers are incorrect what brp said..
finnally this his new motor will be a 20 hp advantage over the poo, along with less oil and fuel consumption and have 50 more ccs, with less rotational weight
i don't see how that is a bad thing Lenny.. We will see soon enought
Horse power means nothing unless your chute climbing or drag racing for 10 milesShow us your sources that put the Poo 800 at 155. Everything I've read on the Poo 800 H.O. puts it in the low 160s. Hmmm, only a couple hp less, yet 50 cc less. Good job Doo, getting two more hp out of an extra 50 cc.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD