Dragonalain
Active VIP Member
Over the last 7/8 years I’ve been running aftermarket suspension on my sleds. upgraded front shocks and full rear skid set ups. I’ll never go back to a factory rear suspension as I can’t stand how on rough trails they alway buck. This year on my mod sled. I’m still going to running 15 pounds again. Im going from a 163 x3 racers edge rear arm to a 174 timber sled rear drop in skid with a 174 X3.
We built another mod sled identical engine/ turbo wise and hope to run similar boost. We had some old parts laying around the shop, 163 ezryde suspension for a cat and a 174 2.5 camo x. It took a few hours and some thinking but we were able to get that skid in the sled with a 174 track and everything seems to work properly.
Today I was looking at the sleds since they are mostly assembled and could not believe the difference in approach angles. The ezryde skid that we pushed back has a 6.1 degree approach and the timber sled has a 14 degree approach.
I know I’m not the first person to push a skid back for a longer track. Has anyone here had any experience with such a set up. The skid that we pushed back has the nicest approach angle I’ve ever seen. Looking forward to get some miles on it. If it works as good as I think, I’ll be pushing my 174 skid back. I can only get 2 inches but I’m sure that it would help.
Best suspension I’ve currently used for bumps is by far the kmod it did not like to keep the skis down even when coupled. However Much Better than stock. The roughest suspension was that racer edge in the mounting hole that they recommend up an inch and a head a hole. It kept the skis planted. After I put the rear link back in the stock hole it was much smoother but did not keep the skis planted.
Here’s a picture of both sleds and angles. The sled on the stand does not have skis yet but I don’t think it will change much once is on the ground.
x
We built another mod sled identical engine/ turbo wise and hope to run similar boost. We had some old parts laying around the shop, 163 ezryde suspension for a cat and a 174 2.5 camo x. It took a few hours and some thinking but we were able to get that skid in the sled with a 174 track and everything seems to work properly.
Today I was looking at the sleds since they are mostly assembled and could not believe the difference in approach angles. The ezryde skid that we pushed back has a 6.1 degree approach and the timber sled has a 14 degree approach.
I know I’m not the first person to push a skid back for a longer track. Has anyone here had any experience with such a set up. The skid that we pushed back has the nicest approach angle I’ve ever seen. Looking forward to get some miles on it. If it works as good as I think, I’ll be pushing my 174 skid back. I can only get 2 inches but I’m sure that it would help.
Best suspension I’ve currently used for bumps is by far the kmod it did not like to keep the skis down even when coupled. However Much Better than stock. The roughest suspension was that racer edge in the mounting hole that they recommend up an inch and a head a hole. It kept the skis planted. After I put the rear link back in the stock hole it was much smoother but did not keep the skis planted.
Here’s a picture of both sleds and angles. The sled on the stand does not have skis yet but I don’t think it will change much once is on the ground.
x